Interview/Amitabh Bachchan
'This is our country and we're not going to let anyone drive us out'
The superstar defends his decision to hold the Miss World contest, in an interview with Sunday editor Vir Sanghvi
In the aftermath of Michael Jackson, it has been suggested that
your big mistake was in deciding to move out of Bombay. Bal Thackeray
would have ensured that the pageant was a success here just as
he did with the Jackson concert.
First of all, I think it's mistake to confuse Miss World with
the Jackson concert. Michael Jackson came here because he wanted
to explore new countries. He gave pleasure to an audience. And
then he left. At the end of it, India was no richer or poorer.
Miss World is not an exclusively Indian event. The live audience
is minuscule compared to the two-and-a-half billion people who
will watch it worldwide on television. The attraction for us was
that we could use the event to get into people's living rooms
all over the world and show them what India was capable of. It
gave us an opportunity to promote India to a captive audience
that we would not have otherwise reached.
So I don't think there are any parallels with the concert. That
was a live event. This is a global opportunity.
All the same, why Bangalore?
We researched several cities. Bangalore won out because we thought
it represents a healthy mixture of East and West. It is an emerging
megapolis, it has a sound infrastructure and has Indian's Silicon
Valley, it is a technological hub.
Bombay and Delhi are well-known all over the world. But Bangalore
is only just getting that recognition and we though that it would
be a good idea to locate the pageant in such a city.
Those are the broad reasons. There were two others, one emotional
and one commercial.
The commercial reason was that Welcomegroup are hosting the participants
and they had hotels in Delhi and Bangalore. They did not have
a property in Bombay.
We could perhaps have gotten around that factor but there was
a emotional reason. I love Bangalore. I've always thought that
Bangalore was a perfect city for an international event because
of the spirit of the people.
That probably swung it in Bangalore's favour.
How do you react to the protests?
Obviously I don't agree with the protestors. But this is a democratic
country, they have freedom of speech.
At the same time, we have the right to host the contest. We're
not doing anything illegal or unconstitutional. All permissions
have been sought and granted.
Ideally, both sides should respect the others' point of view.
That's not happening. Violence is being threatened.
The violence is frightening. There is no way you can justify a
recourse to violence. And it's not going to bring about any kind
of solution.
At the same time, if these people are threatening violence then
the state should look into it. I'm a citizen of this country.
And if I need protection, I will seek it.
Is that why you shifted the swimsuit round to the Seychelles?
It's the beachwear round. The contestants wear wraps and things
like that. It hasn't been called the swimsuit round for years.
But on the bigger issue of shifting the contest, absolutely not.
We had offers from The Seychelles and from Goa. We turned them
down. This is our country and we're not going to let anyone drive
us out.
What about the beachwear round?
The beachwear round is usually hosted in a different country from
the main pageant. Last year, the pageant was in Sun City but the
beachwear round was in Dubai and The Comorres Islands.
Why Dubai?
Good question. What happened was this. Emirates were the sponsors.
And they thought that the pageant offered a unique opportunity
to promote their country. So they insisted on Dubai as the location
for one of the rounds.
Now, as far as I know, Dubai is not some decadent Western country
or whatever the protestors are calling England and America these
days. But even Dubai saw the logic and benefit of being able to
use the Miss World platform to promote itself to two-and-a-half
billion people.
I can't understand why some people in India don't see the point.
|